Poll: How do you like the new 2010 Mustang?

[Dreamcast18]

1. AWESOME!!! :tu::tu::tu:


2. IT SUCKS...I'll take a Challenger or Camaro instead :vomit::vomit::vomit:


3. Is there any difference from the 2009??? :confused::confused::confused:


http://i35.tinypic.com/ht6xy8.jpg

http://i38.tinypic.com/x0yazl.jpg

http://i33.tinypic.com/2d2hshh.jpg

http://i35.tinypic.com/2cwsa6o.jpg

http://i38.tinypic.com/156e339.jpg

http://i35.tinypic.com/ht6xy8.jpg

[Diny]

They improved the front, ruined the rear.

[Pepe]

I think it's one of those looks ya 'gotta get used to' first although I agree with Diny that the rear looks horrible ! :vomit:

[GT]

Yes, curlin' the hood looks good... the back looks really bad... screwed up the 'signature' taillights of the 'stang. Also, the side contours should NOT be 'curved' on a mustang...just not right....

[EssexExport]

Well we all know its what's up
front that counts . . . :wink:

[MM84]

Huh?? Did not know they changed it out.....let's see here....

hum...... changed the hood out.....spent about 30 minutes letting the "junior" design guy do the sides and took the rear spolier of a G35

http://i17.ebayimg.com/08/i/001/1c/d5/0ca8_1_sbl.JPG


buy an 09' when they come out and save the cash for something else.

[AC-INXS]

I think those inner two, large headlights look like crap,,,,,,,,,should go with the smaller light kit in the grills of the 1966 version.

Rear end isn't too appealing either,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,but it will sell. Brut numbers of the 4.6L make it an engine to go with > lots of potenial to work with.

jmo

[pumpkin]

You can have my key.

[EssexExport]

I could never really get into Mustangs. Just
seemed (& were) a dime a dozen when I
was growing up & driving in the 60s & 70s.
Looks perfectly fine to me.